1. #16

    Default

    there was already a 50% reduction in casting on others...thats enough. the ONLY problem are freeeeezers. especially holy paraSPAM

  2. #17

    Default

    there was already a 50% reduction in casting on others...thats enough. the ONLY problem are freeeeezers. especially holy paraSPAM

  3. #18
    Registered User Dream's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    387

    Default

    hmmm maybe take the freeze down a bit?....i don't agree with taking the whole thing out all-together, but maybe just tone it down?

  4. #19

    Default

    that 50 percent reductoin aint enougf. not even close to enough of a reduction on others.
    Im to Lazy for this....

  5. #20
    Drikie Judge's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 2002
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    3,247

    Default

    I and, it would appear, almost all of the community thinks that:

    1) PPUs are not balanced
    2) Mainly because of Parashock
    3) And that their buffs are fine as they are (i'm juding this on how there are no nerf t3h shield threads apart from this one)

  6. #21
    Drikie Judge's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 2002
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    3,247

    Default

    Argh stupid god damn fucking double post

  7. #22

    Default

    well their arent nerf the shield posts but their are Monk o Cron posts. and this is the best way to solve that. apus have poison and anti buff while no one else has any thing to combat shelters.
    Im to Lazy for this....

  8. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    September 2002
    Posts
    1,537

    Default

    Nope, ParaSPAM is not the only problem. The second problem most definetly is shelter and deflector...or actually the fact that only APUs can break them with their anti-spells. Other classes should get anti-weapons too.

    /EDIT: alternate solution: limiting shelter+deflector to group only for others then the PPU himself...
    master kurai about resists: "It tuff to figger owt. Dont fink two hard. Make brane hurt."

  9. #24

    Default

    Originally posted by Lucjan
    Nope, ParaSPAM is not the only problem. The second problem most definetly is shelter and deflector...or actually the fact that only APUs can break them with their anti-spells. Other classes should get anti-weapons too.


    I agree.
    "Improvise, adapt to the environment, Darwin, I ching . . . whatever, man, we've got to roll with it."


  10. #25

    Default

    i think getting rid of the shelter and deflecter would be much easier solution

    please consider kk is under manned and cant invent new damage types. and if they did they would probly unbalance somthing else and we would have a diffrent post about how the pacth created new problems
    Im to Lazy for this....

  11. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    September 2002
    Posts
    1,537

    Default

    Originally posted by XoxSnakexoX
    i think getting rid of the shelter and deflecter would be much easier solution

    please consider kk is under manned and cant invent new damage types. and if they did they would probly unbalance somthing else and we would have a diffrent post about how the pacth created new problems
    The damage type already exists, thats not the problem.

    Besides, I actually like the removing shelters and deflectors cast on others idea if that means that sanctums would still remain as they are, otherwise PPUs will lose a huge part of their job.
    master kurai about resists: "It tuff to figger owt. Dont fink two hard. Make brane hurt."

  12. #27
    Banned User Mr Friendly's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2002
    Location
    Pepper Par|<
    Posts
    1,929

    Default Re: Psi Shields no longer castable on others

    Originally posted by XoxSnakexoX
    if ppus could no longer cast shields on others then the game would finnaly be balanced and we can all say good by to monk o cron. any one think this is a good or bad idea?
    ermm yeah, u no longer have permission to speak on the monk topic

  13. #28
    Norfolk 'n' Clue LTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 2003
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    Heh if you made em no longer castable on others... then just delete the ppu.... he'll serve no function whatsoever...


    i ain't even gonna post my suggestions cuz it ain't gonna happen and i've posted em about 20 times or something :/

  14. #29
    Banned User Mr Friendly's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2002
    Location
    Pepper Par|<
    Posts
    1,929

    Default

    i can 95% gaurantee u that at least 5 apus from each server will quit, & 75% of ALL ppus everywhere would quit

    the sole purpose of the ppu is to strengthen those around them, it even says in the FaQs

  15. #30

    Default

    Originally posted by LTA
    then just delete the ppu....


    Excellent idea, and I completely support it.
    "Improvise, adapt to the environment, Darwin, I ching . . . whatever, man, we've got to roll with it."


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •