Actually,Quote:
Originally Posted by ]v[ortice
Quote:
The High Court in the UK ruled in February 2001 that a contributor to an online discussion group could not hide behind an anonymous online identity when posting defamatory remarks to the group.
The investment advice services Motley Fool Ltd and interactive Investor Ltd operated web sites which contained discussion boards acting as forums for various companies including Totalise plc, an ISP.
A contributor using the online identity of Zeddust began posting defamatory comments about Totalise to the web sites. After complaints from Totalise, Motley Fool and Interactive Investor agreed to remove the offending material but refused to disclose the true identity of Zeddust. The action of the companies in promptly removing the defamatory material is understandable in the wake of the Godfrey v Demon case.
Totalise were unhappy with the refusal to disclose Zeddust's identity and complained to the High Court. The judge ruled that Zeddust’s true identity must be disclosed because the material was clearly defamatory and to allow Zeddust to remain anonymous would mean that people could post anonymous defamatory statements with impunity.
That case sets a precedent countering your post.