Izeo
25-01-13, 17:11
Anyone know a good one? I need a free video editing software that just supports: simple frame timeline splitting (i.e. razor tool), supports variable resolution, and preferably supports the ability to export your clip uncompressed/raw video.
Windows Movie Maker doesn't cut it only because it doesn't let you choose a custom resolution (nor does it support exporting uncompressed). I had a friend years ago who loved using a free thing called something like Cool Ulead Video Studio, so I gave it shot today. It's not free though (at least, anymore) and won't let you export your video until you buy it. Also, way too much overhead for my taste (takes a long time to load, very sluggish interface because of overhead). I'd be happy with something from the Windows XP era, as long as it had the above three functionalities. (timeline razor, variable resolution, export uncompressed)
("Export uncompressed?" If your video editing software has the ability to export uncompressed video, then if you for example upload it to YouTube, it will only be compressed by YouTube. This way, your video won't be double-compressed and potentially lower quality.)
Thanks:)
Windows Movie Maker doesn't cut it only because it doesn't let you choose a custom resolution (nor does it support exporting uncompressed). I had a friend years ago who loved using a free thing called something like Cool Ulead Video Studio, so I gave it shot today. It's not free though (at least, anymore) and won't let you export your video until you buy it. Also, way too much overhead for my taste (takes a long time to load, very sluggish interface because of overhead). I'd be happy with something from the Windows XP era, as long as it had the above three functionalities. (timeline razor, variable resolution, export uncompressed)
("Export uncompressed?" If your video editing software has the ability to export uncompressed video, then if you for example upload it to YouTube, it will only be compressed by YouTube. This way, your video won't be double-compressed and potentially lower quality.)
Thanks:)