Satan2k2
24-10-12, 11:41
Hello guys,
I'm wondering what thoughts are behind the non-LE and LE rules.
For example for support:
LE can heal LE
non-LE can heal non-LE
LE can't heal non-LE
non-LE can't heal LE
It's fine and good... but what's the meaning of non-le can't support le's?
Take a look at this:
LEs can't fight LEs, its okay that they can support each other :).
non-LEs cant fight LEs, so as a non-LE it will be okay to support the LEs, or not?
LEs can't fight non-LEs but non-LEs can fight non-LEs, so LEs can't support non-LEs.
My suggestion for the new rules are these:
LE can heal LE
non-LE can heal non-LE
non-LE can heal LE
LE can't heal non-LE
I'm wondering what thoughts are behind the non-LE and LE rules.
For example for support:
LE can heal LE
non-LE can heal non-LE
LE can't heal non-LE
non-LE can't heal LE
It's fine and good... but what's the meaning of non-le can't support le's?
Take a look at this:
LEs can't fight LEs, its okay that they can support each other :).
non-LEs cant fight LEs, so as a non-LE it will be okay to support the LEs, or not?
LEs can't fight non-LEs but non-LEs can fight non-LEs, so LEs can't support non-LEs.
My suggestion for the new rules are these:
LE can heal LE
non-LE can heal non-LE
non-LE can heal LE
LE can't heal non-LE